CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD, (N.D.Cal. 2002)

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Case No. C-97-2965 MMC

Attorney(S)

Louise H. Renne, City Attorney, Mara E. Rosales, Airports General Counsel, and Melba Yee, Deputy City Attorney, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA., Barry S. Sandals, Esq., Nancy L. Hayes, Esq., and Robin S. Stafford, Esq., MORRISON FORESTER LLP., San Francisco, CA., Carol J. Marshall, Esq., George C. Leal, Esq., CHAN, DOI, MARSHALL LEAL LLP., San Francisco, CA., for Co-Counsel for Plaintiff. Vernon H. Granneman, Esq., Beth L. Hamilton, Esq., and Georgia K. Van Zanten, Esq., SKJERVEN, MORRILL, MacPHERSON, FRANKLIN FRIEL, LLP., San Jose, CA., for Defendant, AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC. Toby MacCary, Esq., Rod D. Margo, Esq., and Geneva A. Collins, Esq., CONDON FORSYTH, Los Angeles, CA., for Defendant, QANTAS AIRWAYS, LIMITED; CANADIAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL, LTD.; CHINA AIRLINES, LTD. John F. Barg, Esq., Beth S. Jordan, Esq., and Geoffrey Yost, Esq., LANDELS, RIPLEY DIAMOND, San Francisco, CA., for Defendant and Cross-Defendant UNOCAL CORPORTATION. Sarah G. Flanagan, Esq., Stacey P. Geis, Esq., PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP., San Francisco, CA., for Counterdefendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. John J. Verber, Esq., Matthew G. Dudley, Esq., BURNHAM BROWN, Oakland, CA., for Counterdefendant SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY. Jeffrey L. Fillerup, Esq., LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON SCRIPPS LLP., San Francisco, CA., for Counterdefendant PS GROUP, INC. J. Michael Oehmler, Esq., FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Memphis, TN., for Counterdefendant FEDERAL EXPRESS. James Wesley Kinnear, Esq., Karen D. Fineran, Esq., MAKOFF KINNEAR COUNSEL P.C., San Francisco, CA., for TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC. Christian Volz, Esq., Edward P. Sangster, Esq., McKENNA CUNEO, L.L.P., San Francisco, CA., for Counterdefendant DELTA AIR LINES, INC. James J. Dragna, Esq., Jill F. Cooper, Esq., McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN ENERSEN, LLP., Los Angeles, CA., for Counterdefendant NORTHWEST AIRLINES. David J. Tuckfield, Esq., VINSON ELKINS L.L.P., Austin, TX., for CONTINENTAL AIRLINES. Joseph J. Armao, Esq., Heather N. Leal, Esq., HELLER EHRMAN WHITE McAULIFFE, San Francisco, CA., for Defendant AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. Marilee J. Allan, Esq., McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN ENERSEN, LLP., San Francisco, CA., for JAPAN AIRLINES. L. Kent Wyatt, Esq., Lisa L. Palombo, Esq., HARDY ERICH BROWN WILSON Sacramento, CA., for Defendant AIRCRAFT SERVICE INTERNATIONAL GROUP. Harvey T. Elam, Esq., ELAM ROBBINS, San Francisco, CA., for Defendant AIRBORNE FREIGHT CORPORATION. Jon Benjamin, Esq., LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE MACRAE, L.L.P., San Francisco, CA., for Defendant TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC. Robert Baratta, Esq., FREEBORN PETERS, Chicago, IL., for Defendant SIGNATURE FLIGHT SUPPORT-CALIFORNIA, INC.

Judges

Maxine M. Chesney

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE, TOLLING AGREEMENT, AND DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS, CROSSCLAIMS, AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINTS

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, United States District Judge.

Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO"), and PS Trading, Inc. ("PST") and PS Group, Inc. ("PSG"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

ARCO has filed various complaints, including a Third Party Complaint and Counterclaim, against PSG. All such claims that ARCO has filed against PST and/or PSG in this case are referred to herein as the "ARCO COMPLAINTS". PST has filed a Cross-claim against ARCO. All such claims that PST and/or PSG has filed against ARCO in this case are referred to herein as the "PST/PSG COMPLAINTS". ARCO and PST/PSG have determined that it is in their best interests to dismiss any and all of the ARCO COMPLAINTS and the PST/PSG COMPLAINTS without prejudice, as follows:

1. ARCO hereby stipulates to dismiss the ARCO COMPLAINTS without prejudice.

2. PST and PSG hereby stipulate to dismiss the PST/PSG COMPLAINTS without prejudice.

3. PST/PSG and ARCO further stipulate that any claims for breach of contract and/or

contractual indemnity alleged in the ARCO COMPLAINTS and any claims for breach of contract and/or contractual indemnity alleged in the PST/PSG COMPLAINTS are tolled, such that any common law or statutory statute of limitations or time-based defense is tolled, meaning that any such claims can and may be filed in this or another court of competent jurisdiction on or before September 1, 2003. Nothing in this stipulation constitutes an agreement by PST/PSG or ARCO that the any such claims for breach of contract and/or contractual indemnity have merit or are not barred by the "good faith" determinations previously made by this court, rather such stipulation only tolls time-based defenses as to such claims to the extent, if any, that such claims can be proven in the future.

DATED: February 1, 2002 LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON SCRIPPS LLP

By Jeffrey L. Fillerup Jeffrey L. Fillerup, Attorneys for PS TRADING, INC. and PS GROUP, INC.

DATED: February 1, 2002 STANTON, KAY WATSON LLP

By James P. Watson, James P. Watson, Attorneys for ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

Comments