AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THOMAS H. FAHRENHOLZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SECURITY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND THE KREINER COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

We affirm, for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Fahey, J.), the order granting that part of the cross motion of defendant Security Mutual Insurance Company (Security Mutual) seeking dismissal of the second cause of action. In that cause of action, plaintiff sought a declaration that Security Mutual is required to submit to an appraisal pursuant to Insurance Law § 3404 (g). We add only that Insurance Law § 3404, in its present form, does not eliminate the prohibition against seeking specific performance of the appraisal provision in the standard fire insurance policy set forth in CPLR 7601. Further legislative action is required to eliminate that prohibition.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAHRENHOLZ v. SECURITY MUTUAL INS. CO
(Feb 1, 2002)