AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE APPLICATION OF POLICE OFFICER JAMES ORTIZ, ETC., PETITIONER, FOR A JUDGMENT, ETC., v. HOWARD SAFIR, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

The penalty of dismissal, which was based upon findings that petitioner, while effecting an arrest for disorderly conduct, anhandled an unthreatening, nonresistant arrestee, shoved him down a subway stairway, flung his passport into his face, charged him with resisting arrest without probable cause and made false statements about the incident to the Civilian Complaint Review Board, does not shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233; Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 445). No basis exists to disturb respondent's findings as to credibility (see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, id., at 443-444).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE APPLICATION OF ORTIZ v. SAFIR
(Feb 5, 2002)