AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM ODOM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BRIDGE VIEW II COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, START ELEVATORS INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Since the record did not permit the motion court to conclude as a matter of law either that negligence by defendant Start proximately caused plaintiff's alleged injury or that defendant-appellant movant Bridge View was free of negligence in connection with plaintiff's harm, Bridge View's motion for summary judgment upon its claim for common-law indemnification from Start was properly denied (see, Correia v. Professional Data Mgt., Inc., 259 A.D.2d 60, 65; see also, Sledz v. 333 E. 68 St. Corp., 254 A.D.2d 196).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ODOM v. BRIDGE VIEW II CO
(Feb 14, 2002)