Since defendant's ineffective assistance claim primarily involves matters dehors the record, including questions of strategy and consultations between defendant and her counsel, it would require a CPL 440.10 motion in order to expand the record. To the extent the existing record permits review, it establishes that trial counsel provided meaningful representation (see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714). We note that it is defendant who is ultimately to blame for giving perjured testimony at trial.
Defendant's claim that the court inappropriately interfered with the examination of witnesses is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court's minor clarifying interventions were appropriate (see, People v. Moulton, 43 N.Y.2d 944).
We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.