ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant husband's contention that the arrears for maintenance and child support should be excused based on the doctrines of waiver and estoppel is unsupported by the record. The Supreme Court correctly found that the defendant failed to show a voluntary relinquishment by the plaintiff wife of her entitlement to maintenance and child support (see, Matter of Dox v. Tynon, 90 N.Y.2d 166; Messina v. Messina, 143 A.D.2d 735; cf., Matter of O'Conner v. Curcio, 281 A.D.2d 100).
Moreover, the defendant's claim that the Supreme Court erred in awarding prejudgment interest is not properly before this court, as it was raised for the first time in a reply brief on appeal (see, Morgan v. New York City Housing Auth., 255 A.D.2d 565).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
O'BRIEN, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.