AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PETER CASTALDO, respondent, v. CHARLOTTE MIGLIORE, ET AL., appellants.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants established a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury through the affirmed medical reports of a neurologist and an orthopedist who examined him and concluded that he sustained nothing more than sprains and strains (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956-957).

The medical evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion failed to set forth verified objective medical findings that were based on a recent examination of the plaintiff (see, Grossman v. Wright, 268 A.D.2d 79). Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212[b]).

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CASTALDO v. MIGLIORE
(Feb 25, 2002)