ORDERED that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.
The letter from the defendant seller's attorney to the plaintiff buyer's attorney stating that closing would take place "on or prior to" a stated date did not make time of the essence (see, O'Connell v. Clear Holding Co., 126 A.D.2d 530). In any event, the designation of a stated date failed to afford the plaintiff a reasonable time within which to close on the parties' contract (see, Knight v. McClean, 171 A.D.2d 648, 650). Therefore, the defendant's refusal to close on a subsequent date constituted a breach of the contract and, under the circumstances presented, the plaintiff purchaser is entitled to specific performance.
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
S. MILLER, J.P., SCHMIDT, CRANE and COZIER, JJ., concur.