Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Arthur Ray Martinez, Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals his Conviction, Judgment and Sentence for two counts of Aggravated Sexual Assault, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-405(Supp. 1999), and one count of sodomy on a child, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-403.1(Supp. 1999). Appellant's appointed counsel filed an Anders-type brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) (adopted in Utah by) State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief satisfies the requirements of this court's opinion in that case. Counsel further certified that he had provided Appellant a copy of the proposed Anders-type brief and has incorporated into the brief all issues raised by Appellant. See State v. Wells, 2000 UT App 304,¶¶ 8-10, 13 P.3d 1056. Based on our examination of the record and all proceedings in the trial court, we determine the appeal is wholly frivolous.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's conviction and sentence and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

Gregory K. Orme, Judge, William A. Thorne, Jr., Judge.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MARTINEX
(Mar 7, 2002)