Defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied. The 18-day period at issue was properly excluded from the time in which the People were required to be ready because defendant failed to appear and a bench warrant was issued and stayed against him (People v. Notholt, 242 A.D.2d 251, 254; People v. Cruz, 236 A.D.2d 322, 323, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1090). Moreover, the adjournment was clearly on consent because defense counsel informed the court that he was actually engaged and effectively requested an adjournment of unspecified length, as well as actively participating in setting a mutually convenient adjourned date (see, People v. Lassiter, 240 A.D.2d 293; People v. Cambridge, 230 A.D.2d 649, 650).
The court's verdict in the nonjury trial was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of identification and credibility, including the weight to be given the inability of the police to recover drugs or buy money from defendant, were properly considered by the trier of facts and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations.
We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.