AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STEVEN J. NUSSBAUMER AND TERRY L. NUSSBAUMER, Plaintiffs-respondents, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

It is well settled that supervision of discovery is within Supreme Court's broad discretion and should not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion ( see, Kern v. City of Rochester [appeal No. 1] , 267 A.D.2d 1026; Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co., 259 A.D.2d 1041, 1042). Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion seeking dismissal of the action based on plaintiffs' failure to respond to defendant's second set of interrogatories and notice to produce or, in the alternative, seeking to compel plaintiffs to do so.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NUSSBAUMER v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
(Mar 15, 2002)