AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE C., Respondent, v. JUAN ORENGO, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division properly determined that the sentencing court did not base its determination upon inaccurate information. Here, the record indicates that the sentencing court did not consider any of the prosecutor's inaccurate assertions in its sentencing determination, but predicated that sentence on the nature and details of the particular crime of which defendant was convicted. Moreover, the Appellate Division correctly determined that, as a matter of law, defendant's counsel was not ineffective (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ORENGO, 60 (N.Y. 3-21-2002)
(Mar 21, 2002)