AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF LESLEY ROBINSON, respondent, v. QUEEN McKENZIE, appellant.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"A * * * parent may not be deprived of custody of his or her child absent `surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness or other like extraordinary circumstances'" (Matter of Carosi v. Bloom, 225 A.D.2d 692 quoting Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 544). Where extraordinary circumstances have been established, the court must inquire into the best interests of the child before making the custody determination (see Matter of Odums v. Metcalf, 276 A.D.2d 794, 795).

Contrary to the mother's contention, there was sufficient evidence to establish that extraordinary circumstances existed (see Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, supra). Having found the existence of extraordinary circumstances, the Family Court properly determined that the best interests of the child would be served by awarding custody to the paternal grandmother (see, Matter of Odums v. Metcalf, supra).

The Family Court's determination that the mother's visitation with the child should be supervised has a sound and substantial basis in the record and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Minas v. Shevlin, 254 A.D.2d 420, 421).

O'BRIEN, J.P., LUCIANO, TOWNES and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF ROBINSON v. McKENZIE
(Apr 1, 2002)