AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., appellant, v. MICHAEL WILLIAMS, respondent.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, and the motion is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the indictment.

The delay in the defendant's trial resulted from the unavailability of a key prosecution witness, who was deployed for military service in Kosovo. The delay was attributable to an exceptional circumstance, and therefore, was excludable pursuant to CPL 30.30(4)(g) (see People v. Grady, 111 A.D.2d 932). The People could not have preserved the testimony of the witness prior to his departure for Kosovo (see CPL 660.20; People v. Craig, 151 Misc.2d 442). Accordingly, excluding the time in question, the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment should have been denied.

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS
(Apr 8, 2002)