AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF SOLOMON ABRAHAMS, ETC., petitioner, v. JOHN P. DiBLASI, ETC., ET AL., respondents.

Motion by the respondent John P. DiBlasi to dismiss the proceeding.

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

S. MILLER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF ABRAHAMS v. DiBLASI
(Apr 8, 2002)