ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the trial court should have instructed the jury that evidence of guilt as to one criminal incident could not be considered evidence of guilt as to the other incident charged in the indictment (see People v. Robbins, 239 A.D.2d 526; see also People v. Davis, 195 A.D.2d 605; People v. Lewis, 175 A.D.2d 885; CPL 470.05).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
PRUDENTI, P.J., FEUERSTEIN, FRIEDMANN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.