ORDERED the order and the interlocutory judgment are affirmed, with costs.
The Town of Huntington established, prima facie, that its failure to repaint the "edge line" on Waterside Avenue was not a proximate cause of the plaintiff Penelope Vigmostad's injury. Since the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition thereto, the Supreme Court properly granted the Town's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against it (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).
The plaintiffs' cross motion for a unified trial was correctly denied since they did not demonstrate the existence of the limited circumstances under which the issues of liability and damages may be tried together (see CPLR 603; Parmar v. Skinner, 154 A.D.2d 444; Louise B.G. v. New York City Bd. of Education, 143 A.D.2d 728).
FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.