ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence. "[T]he discretionary power to set aside a jury verdict and order a new trial must be exercised with considerable caution, for in the absence of indications that substantial justice has not been done, a successful litigant is entitled to the benefits of a favorable jury verdict" (Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 133). A verdict should not be set aside unless "the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence" (Nicastro v. Park, supra, at 134; quoting Delgado v. Board of Educ., 65 A.D.2d 547, affd 48 N.Y.2d 643). Here, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury properly assessed the witnesses, the accuracy of their testimony, and the discrepancies therein (see Teneriello v. Travelers Cos., 264 A.D.2d 772).
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.