ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19-20; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The fact that two of the People's witnesses had unsavory and criminal backgrounds, and one testified pursuant to a cooperation agreement, does not render their respective testimony incredible as a matter of law (see People v. Toro, 272 A.D.2d 351; People v. McDaniel, 233 A.D.2d 343; People v. Ellis, 188 A.D.2d 1043). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15).
Contrary to the defendant's contention, he received the effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147).
The defendant's remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review and/or without merit.
SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, McGINITY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.