AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE APPLICATION OF YASHUA AMEN SHEKHEM EL BEY, PETITIONER, FOR A JUDGMENT, ETC., v. THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

There is no merit to petitioner's argument that the charge of falsely claiming exemption from Federal income taxation was barred by the 18-month Statute of Limitations in Civil Service Law § 75(4). Such misconduct constituted a crime under 26 U.S.C. § 7205 (fraudulent withholding exemption certificate or failure to supply information) and Penal Law § 175.30 (offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree), and, as such, is expressly excluded from section 75(4) (see, Matter of Mieles v. Safir, 272 A.D.2d 199). Substantial evidence supports respondent's findings that petitioner submitted false information on a Certificate of Exemption and Withholding in Lieu of IRS Form W-4, was excessively absent, left his residence without authorization while on sick leave, failed to log in and out with the Health Management Division, failed to comply with an instruction to present his firearms to the Health Maintenance Division, and attended an administrative hearing in another matter without authorization while on sick leave, all in violation of respondent's rules. No basis exists to disturb respondent's findings of credibility. The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE EL BEY v. N.Y. CITY DEPT. OF CORR
(May 9, 2002)