AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL SPALLHOLTZ, et al., appellants, v. HAMPTON C.F. CORP., et al., defendants, NATIONAL ENVIROTECH GROUP, LLC, respondent.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that "liability may not be imposed for breach of warranty or strict products liability upon a party that is outside the manufacturing, selling, or distribution chain" (Joseph v. Yenkin Majestic Paint Corp., 261 A.D.2d 512; see Passaretti v. Aurora Pump Co., 201 A.D.2d 475). It is undisputed that National Envirotech Group, LLC, did not manufacture or sell the subject machine. Further, its isolated act of arranging for a temporary exchange between two companies of the subject machine for another machine and for the shipment of the machine does not make it a distributor or seller for the purposes of imposing liability under theories of strict products liability or breach of warranty (see Sukljian v. Ross Son Co., 69 N.Y.2d 89, 95-96).

With respect to the cause of action to recover damages for negligence, it is well settled that "before a defendant may be held liable for negligence, it must be shown that the defendant owes a duty to the plaintiff" (Pulka v. Edelman, 40 N.Y.2d 781, 782). National Envirotech Group, LLC, owed no duty to the injured plaintiff with respect to the subject machine.

SMITH, J.P., O'BRIEN, McGINITY and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPALLHOLTZ v. HAMPTON C.F. CORP
(May 13, 2002)