ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Under the circumstances of this case, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request for an adjournment of the sentencing hearing (see CPL 390.50[a], 400.21; People v. Singleton, 41 N.Y.2d 402; People v. Melvin, 223 A.D.2d 604; People v. Russo, 172 A.D.2d 295, 296).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.