DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
"Equitable distribution presents matters of fact to be resolved by the trial court, and its distribution of the parties' marital property should not be disturbed unless it can be shown that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in so doing" (Oster v. Goldberg, 226 A.D.2d 515; see Petrie v. Petrie, 124 A.D.2d 449, 450; Foxx v. Foxx, 114 A.D.2d 605, 606). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in distributing the marital property in this case (see Oster v. Goldberg, supra).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, S. MILLER and McGINITY, JJ., concur.