Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

IN THE MATTER OF RONALD REICHSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-261, concluding that RONALD REICHSTEIN of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1959, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(b) (making false and misleading statements and counseling a client to testify falsely) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation);

And the conclusion of the Disciplinary Review Board that a reprimand is sufficient discipline for respondent's submission of proof that he has retired from the practice of law, and respondent having certified that he is retired; And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RONALD REICHSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that RONALD REICHSTEIN, having represented that he is retired completely from the practice of law, shall not engage in the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE REICHSTEIN
(Jun 3, 2002)