ANTOKU v. GRACE INDUSTRIES, INC

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

01-05593

Attorney(S)

Harmon, Linder Rogowsky (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for appellant. London Fischer, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Brian A. Kalman, Anthony F. Tagliagambe, and James A. Minniti of counsel), for respondent.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

01-05593

Attorney(S)

Harmon, Linder Rogowsky (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for appellant. London Fischer, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Brian A. Kalman, Anthony F. Tagliagambe, and James A. Minniti of counsel), for respondent.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

LUIS ANTOKU, appellant, v. GRACE INDUSTRIES, INC., respondent.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In moving to vacate his default, the plaintiff did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse or the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see Fuller v. Tae Kwon, 259 A.D.2d 662).

ALTMAN, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, FRIEDMANN, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

LUIS ANTOKU, appellant, v. GRACE INDUSTRIES, INC., respondent.

Comments