AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. PETER CORINES, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to hear and report on the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 to set aside the verdict on an allegation of juror misconduct, and the matter is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court shall hear and report with all deliberate speed.

The defendant has made a sufficient showing that one or more jurors who were employed in some capacity as medical professionals improperly influenced the other jurors by interjecting their inside knowledge and unique expertise into the jury deliberations. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court erred in not conducting a hearing on this issue (see People v. Maragh, 94 N.Y.2d 569; People v. Irizarry, 83 N.Y.2d 557; People v. Testa, 61 N.Y.2d 1008, 1009; People v. Brown, 48 N.Y.2d 388, 393; People v. Durling, 303 N.Y. 382). Accordingly, the Supreme Court is ordered to conduct a hearing and report its findings to this court with all deliberate speed.

We decide no other issues at this time.

SMITH, J.P., O'BRIEN, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CORINES
(Jun 10, 2002)