AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER RANDALL, appellant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the voluntariness of the plea since he never moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665; People v. Aloisi, 177 A.D.2d 491). In any event, the defendant's guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SMITH, J.P., O'BRIEN, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RANDALL
(Jun 10, 2002)