The motion was properly denied since defendant's initial papers in support thereof do not identify a single witness who would be inconvenienced by having to travel to New York County. The requested change of venue is grounded upon a police accident report listing a witness who resides in Liberty, Sullivan County and the fact that plaintiff received medical treatment in Sullivan County; these factors alone are insufficient (see, Iassinski v. Vassiliev, 220 A.D.2d 372, 372-373). In any event, were we to consider the witness names and description of anticipated testimony first appearing in defendant's reply papers (but see, Barbot v. Nagabushana, 235 A.D.2d 289), we would also find such insufficient since, among other things, there is no indication that the witnesses were ever contacted (see, Carrozza v. Galeria Mall, 292 A.D.2d 279, 739 N.Y.S.2d 153, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3156).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.