AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LOUIS EVANGELISTA, PLAINTIFF, v. ABNER SLATT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, LEE AUSTER, NON-PARTY APPELLANT.

Any judgment herein cannot exceed "the amount that `could or would have been collected' in the underlying action" (McKenna v. Forsyth Forsyth, 280 A.D.2d 79, 82). Therefore, any payments or other transfers of value that appellant may have made in satisfaction of the liabilities underlying the default judgment, as well as appellant's ability to satisfy any such liabilities still outstanding, are material and necessary to the defense of this action.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EVANGELISTA v. SLATT
(Jun 11, 2002)