AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BRYAN G. WITZIGMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court's Sandoval ruling did not constitute an abuse of discretion ( see People v. Hayes, 97 N.Y.2d 203, 207-208). By ruling that defendant could be asked on cross-examination whether he previously had been convicted of a felony and two misdemeanors without reference to the underlying criminal acts, the court properly balanced the probative value of that evidence against its potential for prejudice ( see People v. Walker, 83 N.Y.2d 455, 458-459; People v. Wheeler, 281 A.D.2d 949, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 836; People v. Brockway, 277 A.D.2d 482, 485).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WITZIGMAN
(Jun 14, 2002)