AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MATTER OF DOUGLAS GOSTON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES AND NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in annulling the determination of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (Division) in this proceeding brought pursuant to Executive Law § 298 and in remitting the matter to the Division for further investigation. Where, as here, "a determination of no probable cause is rendered [by the Division] without holding a public hearing pursuant to Executive Law § 297 (4) (a), the appropriate standard of review is whether the determination was arbitrary and capricious or lacking a rational basis" ( Matter of McFarland v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 A.D.2d 108, 111; see also Matter of Hone v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 223 A.D.2d 761, 762). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the Division properly investigated petitioner's complaint ( see generally 9 NYCRR 465.6) and provided petitioner with a full and fair opportunity to present evidence on his behalf and to rebut the evidence presented by respondent American Airlines ( see e.g. Matter of Murphy v. Russell Sage Coll., 134 A.D.2d 716, 717; Matter of Chirgotis v. Mobil Oil Corp., 128 A.D.2d 400, 402-403, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 612, rearg denied 70 N.Y.2d 748; see also Lee v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 111 A.D.2d 748, 749, lv denied 66 N.Y.2d 606).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF GOSTON v. AMERICAN AIRLINES
(Jun 14, 2002)