Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CARL R. GRADY AND DIANA GRADY, HIS WIFE, Respondents v. FRITO-LAY, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, Petitioner.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted, limited to the following issue.

Whether the Superior Court, en banc, correctly applied the law when it reversed the decision of the trial court to preclude Dr. Charles S. Beroes' expert testimony.

The parties are directed to address the effect of Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), and Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), on the analysis of this issue.

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRADY v. FRITO-LAY, INC
(Jun 28, 2002)