DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the mother's contentions, the Family Court properly determined that the Hearing Examiner providently exercised her discretion in denying the request for a further adjournment of the hearing on her motion to restore a prior application to the calendar and in dismissing that motion upon her default. A request for an adjournment is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and its determination will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see Wolosin v. Campo, 256 A.D.2d 332).
SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, S. MILLER and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.