AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BARRY ROSEN, respondent-appellant, v. BEATRICE SWARZMAN, appellant-respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8 [c],[e]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as, in effect, held the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint in abeyance, and directed a hearing to aid in the determination of that motion, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The portion of the order directing a hearing to aid in the determination of the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) does not decide the motion and does not affect a substantial right (see CPLR 5701[a][2][v]; Kogler v. Nassau County Med. Ctr., 289 A.D.2d 298; Marine Midland Bank v. Rashid, 259 A.D.2d 739; Matter of Town of Babylon v. Taxpayer's Recovery Corp., 240 A.D.2d 417). Therefore, it is not appealable as of right, and leave to appeal has not been granted. Any party, however, aggrieved by an order entered subsequent to the hearing may take an appeal (see Davison-Sakuma v. Sakuma, 280 A.D.2d 577).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying her application for the imposition of a sanction against the plaintiff (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1).

PRUDENTI, P.J., O'BRIEN, McGINITY and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSEN v. SWARZMAN
(Jul 1, 2002)