AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES BENEDICT, respondent, v. MELODY ZIMMER, appellant.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Richmond County, for a hearing on the issue of custody and a de novo determination of the father's petition for a change of custody; and it is further,

ORDERED that the provisions of the order dated June 27, 2000, shall remain in effect pending the new determination.

It was error for the Family Court to issue an order concerning custody and visitation based on controverted allegations without conducting a full evidentiary hearing (see Biagi v. Biagi, 124 A.D.2d 770). Moreover, a custody determination should be made upon consideration of all of the circumstances to reach the disposition that promotes the best interests of the child (see Metzger v. Metzger, 240 A.D.2d 642). Accordingly, we remit the matter for a hearing where the parties and the Law Guardian can present their evidence.

O'BRIEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF BENEDICT v. ZIMMER
(Jul 8, 2002)