Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Snyder et al., Appellants, v. Lindsay et al., Appellees.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to the award of interest, but reversed as to the remand for an evidentiary hearing. Interest is to be computed by the trial court from the date of settlement, consistent with our decision in Hartmann v. Duffey, 95 Ohio St.3d 456, 2002-Ohio-2486, 768 N.E.2d 1170.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissenting.

{¶ 2} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Hartmann v. Duffey, 95 Ohio St.3d 456, 2002-Ohio-2486, 768 N.E.2d 1170, at ¶ 17-22. I respectfully dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SNYDER v. LINDSAY
(Jul 10, 2002)