Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Michael Duane Taylor, Defendant and Appellant

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Michael Taylor appealed from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of (1) possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and (2) fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer. On appeal Taylor challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence found as a result of a search warrant obtained and executed by law enforcement. Taylor asserts the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient to establish the requisite probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant.

[¶ 2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. TAYLOR
(Jul 11, 2002)