MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented in the form of the misbehavior report, the documentation relating to the positive laboratory test results, including the daily log, and the testimony of the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report and conducted the urinalysis testing (see, Matter of Barnwell v. Goord, 268 A.D.2d 725, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 751; Matter of Rivera v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 754). Petitioner's assertion that various procedural errors violated his constitutional rights has been reviewed and found to be without merit. In particular, we find that it was not error for the Hearing Officer to deny petitioner's request to call as witnesses the Deputy Commissioner of Correctional Facility Operations and the Supervisor of Security at Elmira Correctional Facility. Petitioner failed to demonstrate that these individuals possessed any information relevant to the facts that gave rise to this proceeding nor did he show that he was in any way prejudiced by their absence (see, Matter of Nijman v. Goord, 294 A.D.2d 737 [May 16, 2002]; Matter of Blanche v. Selsky, 253 A.D.2d 944, 945, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 817). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner's assertion of Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit.
Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.