Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM STEWART STEELE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL W. MOORE, ETC., Respondent.

ORFINGER, R.B., J.

William Stewart Steele petitions this court for certiorari relief. Steele alleges that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law when it dismissed his petition for mandamus without providing him an opportunity to file a reply to the Department of Correction's response. Because the issue is now moot, we dismiss the petition.

It would serve no useful purpose to recite the long procedural history of this matter. Suffice it to say that the circuit court has now provided Steele an opportunity to file his reply. That renders Steele's petition to this court moot. However, the delay in resolving Steele's underlying mandamus proceeding has been largely attributable to procedural mistakes over which Steele had no control. Accordingly, although we dismiss this petition as moot, we believe the trial court should provide Steele an expeditious ruling on his petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEELE v. MOORE
(Jul 12, 2002)