AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Le v. Strauss Co., Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF LEVI STRAUSS CO. ON DEFENDANT GTFM, INC.'S COUNTERCLAIMS

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge

The Court having granted the motion of Plaintiff Levi Strauss Co. for summary judgment on the counterclaims alleged by Defendant and Counterclaimant GTFM, Inc., for the reasons stated in its order dated March 29, 2002, and all parties having stipulated to the dismissal of all LSCO.'s claims and causes of action in this case against GTFM, Inc. with prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants shall take nothing by their counterclaims against Levi Strauss Co., and that Plaintiff Levi Strauss Co. shall have judgment on all counterclaims in its favor, each party to bear its own costs and fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEVI STRAUSS CO. v. GTFM, INC., (N.D.Cal. 2002)
(Aug 1, 2002)