ORDERED that the appeals from the orders entered November 15, 1999, are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeals lie therefrom (see Family Ct Act § 439[e]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order entered February 1, 2001 is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The father's cross petition sought a downward modification of his support obligations under a judgment of divorce which is subject to the terms of a separation agreement that was incorporated but not merged into the judgment. Under such circumstances, the father must demonstrate "extreme hardship" (Matter of Cohen v. Seletsky, 142 A.D.2d 111, 112; see Domestic Relations Law § 236B[9][b]). The Family Court properly determined that the father failed to do so (see Clark v. Clark, 280 A.D.2d 575; Mishrick v. Mishrick, 251 A.D.2d 558).
The father's remaining contentions are without merit.
PRUDENTI, P.J., SMITH, FRIEDMANN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.