Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In re: Larry Kenneth Alexander, Debtor. Larry Kenneth Alexander, Appellant, v. Mary Jo A. Jensen-Carter, Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Larry Kenneth Alexander appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP's) order affirming the bankruptcy court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and 11 U.S.C. § 105. Alexander also has moved to strike appellee's addendum and portions of appellee's brief.

The Honorable Dennis D. O'Brien, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Alexander's Rule 60(b) motion sought relief from a June 1999 bankruptcy court decision disallowing his claimed homestead exemption, which the BAP and Eighth Circuit affirmed. We conclude the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying Alexander relief. See In re Zimmerman, 869 F.2d 1126, 1127-28 (8th Cir. 1989) (standard of review); Klein v. Arkoma Prod. Co., 73 F.3d 779, 784 (8th Cir.) (under law-of-case doctrine, every question which appellate court has disposed of by decree is finally settled and determined, and district court is bound to carry decree into execution according to mandate), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 815 (1996); Baker Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. Chaske, 28 F.3d 1466, 1475 (8th Cir. 1994); Ins. Corp. of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee, 456 U.S. 694, 702 n. 9 (1982). We also deny Alexander's motion to strike.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE ALEXANDER
(Aug 8, 2002)