Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Ex parte Da v. d Canidate. (In re: Da

WOODALL, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON and LYONS, JJ., concur.

JOHNSTONE, J., concurs specially.

JOHNSTONE, Justice (concurring specially).

While the decision by the Court of Civil Appeals appears to conflict with Carlisle v. State, 512 So.2d 150 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987), quoted at pages 1-7 of the petitioner's brief, the petitioner has not invoked Rule 39(a)(1)(D), Ala.R.App.P., "conflict" as a basis for our certiorari jurisdiction.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EX PARTE CANIDATE
(Aug 16, 2002)