AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF PAUL M. HENSLEY, et al., petitioners-respondents, v. MARTIN I. EFMAN, appellant, et al., respondents.

ORDERED that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly invalidated the designating petitions (see Matter of Burns v. Wiltse, 303 N.Y. 319; Matter of Lawrence v. Spelman, 264 A.D.2d 455).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, S. MILLER, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF HENSLEY v. EFMAN
(Aug 22, 2002)