AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

United States of America and Douglas MacGregor, Senior Team Coordinator, Petitioners, v. Che

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docket Nos. 34, 38 and 54)

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, United States District Judge

Before the Court are petitioners' and respondent's respective objections to and motions for de nova determination of Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil's March 25, 2002 Report and Recommendation Re In Camera Review and petitioners' objections to and motion for de novo review of Magistrate Judge Brazil's June 18, 2002 Report and Recommendation Re Supplemental Submissions.

Having read and considered the above-referenced reports and recommendations and the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the objections and motions, the Court finds the matter appropriate for decision on the papers, VACATES the hearing scheduled for September 6, 2002, and, with one exception, hereby adopts in their entirety Magistrate Judge Brazil's findings and recommendations as set forth in the initial report of March 25, 2002, as supplemented and amended by the report of June 18, 2002.

Magistrate Judge Brazil found document 32 is protected by the work product doctrine. (See Report filed March 25, 2002 at 26,) Respondent concedes that document 32 is not protected by the work product doctrine. (See Response to Petitioners' Objections to Report and Recommendation filed April 22, 2002 at 8:5-6.) Accordingly, the Court finds document 32 is not protected by the work product doctrine.

This order closes Docket Nos. 34, 38 and 54.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION, (N.D.Cal. 2002)
(Sep 12, 2002)