AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. SHAUN OVERTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Defendant's motions to withdraw his plea and for the appointment of new counsel were properly denied without a hearing since the court reviewed defendant's written submissions and gave him a full opportunity to amplify his contentions in court (see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536;People v. Senghor, 248 A.D.2d 299, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 905). The court properly relied upon its own recollections of the plea proceedings and rejected defendant's unsupported claims of innocence, coercion and ineffective assistance (see People v. Hines, 267 A.D.2d 17, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 921).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. OVERTON
(Sep 24, 2002)