Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Carlos Greathouse, Appellant, v. State Of Missouri, Respondent.

ORDER

Carlos Greathouse appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion in which he sought relief from his conviction of first degree murder. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GREATHOUSE v. STATE
(Sep 26, 2002)