AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF JOHN DABBENE, respondent, v. ELAINE DABBENE, appellant.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record supports the Family Court's determination that, based on a preponderance of the credible evidence, the former wife committed a family offense, warranting the issuance of the order of protection (see Family Ct Act § 812; 832; Matter of Hogan v. Hogan, 271 A.D.2d 533).

Under the facts of this case, the Family Court's failure to hold a dispositional hearing does not require reversal (see Matter of Annie C. v. Marcellus W., 278 A.D.2d 177; Matter of Quintana v. Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130; cf. Matter of Alice C. v. Joseph C., 212 A.D.2d 698).

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF DABBENE v. DABBENE
(Oct 1, 2002)