Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. TIMOTHY STUART RING, Appellant. STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee,

Appellants have filed a "Suggestion of Grounds for Recusal" which respectfully requests that Justice Michael Ryan recuse himself from this consolidated action because of his service as superior court judge in Arizona v. Ring, CR 95-01754(A)," to which the State filed a response. Although Justice Ryan ruled on some pre-trial motions in the Ring case, the case was reassigned to another judge and he did not preside at trial or participate in sentencing. Those facts provide no basis on which any reasonable person could reasonably question Justice Ryan's impartiality. See Canons 2.A and 3.E, Code of Judicial Conduct, Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. 81.

The Court has determined that Appellants have shown no grounds for recusal.

DATED this ___ day of October, 2002.

___________________ RUTH V. McGREGOR Vice Chief Justice

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. RING, CR-97-0428-AP (Ariz. 2002)
(Oct 7, 2002)