DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the determination is reinstated.
The Supreme Court improperly concluded that a determination affirming a disciplinary determination following a Tier III disciplinary hearing should be annulled because the hearing was untimely. Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the first extension of time to complete the hearing, granted pursuant to 7 NYCRR 251-5.1(b), was valid. The 14th day following the writing of the inmate misbehavior report was a Sunday. Thus, the grant of an extension on the 15th day was timely (see General Construction Law § 25-a; Maldonado v. Coughlin, 150 A.D.2d 692, 693). The Supreme Court also improperly determined that the appellant failed to obtain another extension to complete the hearing. This issue was not raised by the petitioner in the administrative appeal or in his petition, and therefore was not properly before the Supreme Court.
ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.